Comparison of products

MBO

grotan® OX 

Chemical structure MBOzoom

3,3'-Methylenebis[5-methyl oxazolidine] 

CAS-No.66204-44-2 

Corrosive
Irritant
 
 

TTT

grotan® WS

Chemical structure TTTzoom

α,α',α''-Trimethyl 1,3,5-triazine-1,3,5(2H,4H,6H) triethanol 

CAS-No. 25254-50-6

Irritant
 
 

HHT

Chemical structure HHTzoom

2,2',2"-(Hexahydro 1,3,5-triazine -1,3,5-triyl) triethanol

CAS-No.  4719-04-4

Toxic
 
 

THPS

Chemical structure THPSzoom

Tetrakis(hydroxymethyl) phosphonium sulfate 

CAS-No. 55566-30-8

Toxic
Environmentally Damaging
Corrosive
 
 

GDA

Chemical structure GDAzoom

Glutaral (Glutardialdehyde) 

CAS-No. 111-30-8 

Toxic
Health Hazard
Environmentally Damaging
Corrosive
 
 

Comparison of biocide performance

Biostatic performance on sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB)zoom
Biostatic performance on sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB)

grotan® OX THPS GDA
Active matter >99% 75% 50%
Bacteriostatic efficacy on sulfate-reducing bacteria at 50 ppm of the commercial product after 28 days fully effective failed failed
Bacteriostatic concentration on sulphate-reducing bacteria in presence 3 % NaCl under oilfield conditions 200 ppm 300 ppm 300 ppm
Bacteriostatic concentration on sulphate-reducing bacteria in presence 15 % NaCl under oilfield conditions 200 ppm 300 ppm 750 ppm
 
 

Comparison HHT vs. grotan® OX


HHT grotan® OX
Molecular weight 219 186
Content of water [%] 20 <1
Oil solubility No Yes
Hydrogen Sulfide absorption HHT + 2 hydrogen sulfide MBO + 2 hydrogen sulfide
Ratio of capacity [w/w] 4:1 2.7:1
 

Experts opinions

Comparative study of biocides on SRBzoom
 
Comparative study of biocides on SRBzoom
 
© 2018 Schülke & Mayr GmbH |